| Kasz216 said: Actually Highwaystar products like Tobbaco and Cigarretes LOWER the overall burden of Healthcare... because while people may get cancer or liver disease. They die earlier and aren't a giant cost during old age. Also healthcare in the US would cost more then 7 times the UK system for a variety of reasons. 1) Old people wouldn't except being treated as second class citizens when it comes to healthcare. 2) The US just does everything more expensive because it's a REALLY inefficent government since it's only a 2 party system. The republicans and democrats never have to worry about falling to 2.5 party status. 3) The US is a much bigger country land wise. 4) The US provides 84% of the worlds medical funding. Either the government would have to fund that or medical discoveries that increase peoples health would DRASTICALLY fall off... in which case... medical care in the US and in general the entire world would drastically fall. |
The point was that the financial burden doesn't rely directly on the general tax payer. Those that choose to damage their bodies will pay for treatment through the tax on products they have harmed themselves with onntop of general taxes.
Smokers cost the NHS >£5billion in 2005, however tax raised from the sales of cigarettes in the same year accumulated £9.9billion. And it's more or less been the same year on year, that's just one example. So therefore tax on tobacco product creates a net gain from each smoker, so it would generate income. And if the US were to introduce a policy like that in it's tax system then it too would generate income for the health service without the burden of supporting them being on the tax payer.
The bottom line is that smokers fund their own treatment on top of healthcare and pay partially for the healthcare of the aged with the left over revenue from cigarette taxes.
Also,
It will cost more than 7 times, but I can't imagine it costing more than 15 times the UK healthcare budget. The $3trillion pricetag seems very inflated to me.
