Slimebeast on 07 August 2009
| JEDE3 said: You are saying it's better to use customer sales as an indication of what the retailer pays while you don't take sales that the retailer are doing and bargin bins on games that flop into consideration.... then you call yourself the king? Lol. |
For this thread it's better to use common sense.
It's mathematically impossible that retailers pay $48 if consumers are paying less than $50 for their PS360 games.
I know very well the retailer figures, but the error the sources do is to reveal only the most costly examples (like "we had to pay $52 for a GTA game once!", thereby not giving a proper representation of reality.
