Xoj said:
because microsoft doens't have the first party to support the console, it's know just to drop thinks off. like windows live games, events and the original xbox. the moment the next xbox is announced and its backward compatible, they will drop support. |
If there wasn't enough first party support, how would have MS survived anyway? Not only that they survived, they were outperforming the PS3.
They have some great exclusives (1st, 2nd or 3rd party - customers do NOT care) for 2009 and 2010 already. Rare and Lionhead have been completly silent for quite some time now, they are definatly working on something. And MS created a team for the Halo franchise (343 industries) that has been busy for a while. Plus Tokio Vikings (new team around Tomonobu Itagaki - DoA / Ninja Gaiden) and Mistwalker... so there won't be a shortage of games in the next years.
I can't believe people are bringing this up again. 5 months ago, there were 3 threads a day about the lack of games for MS this Xmas. Now they showed that there is a very good line up for 2009 (Halo ODST / Forza 3 / Left 4 Dead 2 / Modern Warfare 2) and even 2010 (Crackdown2 / Alan Wake / Splinter Cell / FF XIII /etc) and now I have to hear, MS will stop support the Xbox360, because of not enough first party support. BS.
And even IF this would be true (As we all know it is not!) What would starting a new generation do? Would the 1st party get bigger? No. So if MS did what you think, it wouldn't change the problem you made up.
Damn, now I wasted so much text, just to show you, that you got no point at all.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...







