coolbeans said:
Yes, let's be happy that's not the case |
You have no proof of any of the claims in this post.
coolbeans said:
Yes, let's be happy that's not the case |
You have no proof of any of the claims in this post.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
. Really though, was it even necessary for posting to try to pinpoint that as me being one of those people when my first reply basically shows I didn't overlook your first statement? There's really no need to "grasp for straws" or what have you. Point being: MS would lose money if Live became free, Live being free would drive more customers, ads then cost more (or have a reason to), therefore they wouldn't lose as big of a chunk of money in their gaming division as you'd think (which has now been stated thrice (3 times)).