Asriel on 02 August 2009
Same tired old arguments. List of future games, price tag, 360's 1 year headstart, "keeping pace" all used to explain why a machine that had a 1/3 failure rate at launch and is supposedly inferior in terms of games and hardware (and apparently online services too) is still ahead, worldwide.
I do not understand why people need to be so defensive about their console of choice. I also lost all respect for the author with his little P.S. that just had to attack 360 fans. Will these poorly conceived, hyper defensive rants ever end? I don't remember them appearing with such alarming frequency during the last generation.
