Killergran said:
KungKras said:
Let me explain why you can't say a system is more epic than the other.
It is because of the software. We had epic software on the PS1 and the Super Nintendo, so hardware strength is not the issue. The reason that the 360 and PS3 is considered more "serious" is because their software strives to be more "serious". Wii currently has software that can be considered "less serious" but putting a "serious" game on Wii will not make it less seious just because it's on Wii.
The way you are thinking is called prejudice. You identify the systems as "epic" and "serious" even though they have have less "epic" software too. And you identify the Wii as less "serious" even though it got games like Metroid Prime. I'm not saying you're a Wii hater, but software is not affected by hardware. It's the other way around, the software affects the hardware. If Epic Mickey is coming to Wii, it will not make Epic mickey less epic, it will make the Wii more epic.
|
Hardware strenght has absolutely nothing to do with making a game epic or not. That would just be silly.
It's not prejudice, it's image and business strategy.
|
Image and business strategy? You're talking about a Mickey Mouse game for the Wii in competition with Super Mario with IR based controls, and your entire argument is based around the prettiness of concept art created for a game that was conceived and designed from the Wii from the very beginning. How is it "too epic" for the Wii? It was made for the Wii.
