By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pristine20 said:
Slimebeast said:
Pristine20 said:

lol, I always find it strange when a developer says one version of their game is better than the other in a published interview. It's like telling owners of "x" console that you are giving them an inferior experience for the same price. How's that for advertising? It's one thing for edge to do this but Carmack himself? Well good luck selling Rage on ps3.


You are flaming him for just being honest.

How am I flaming him? It's nice that he's honest and all but some things are better  off left to the tabloids. Eurogamer would've posted this info when the game launched anyway. There's a reason capcom always says their games look the same when sites like Eurogamer can somehow find differences.

There's a reason bethesda never officially said that fallout 3 was better on 360 even though the ps3 version was downright craptastic. Think.

If you're developing multiplatform, saying stuff like this is just shooting yourself in the foot whether it's true or not. There's a big difference between 60fps and 20 fps and both games will retail for $60+

 

He is just telling the truth at that point in time. He never said the final PS3 version will run worse than the X360. Maybe he is a naive guy who don't care if every little statement is twisted and used in internet flame wars. I think that's a good thing, because he is displaying info that some serious people want to know about graphics and hardware performance.

Why are you saying Fallout 3 on PS3 was craptastic? I don't believe you. Small differences like screen tearing and pop-ups don't matter.