crumas2 said:
Does it stink to point out this inconsistency? Perhaps you should actually explain why someone's post stinks if you're going to criticize. |
I agree and I think it's pretty ridiculous to call one company greedy and others not greedy. The truth is companies are out to make money and Nintendo and Sony are no different than Microsoft in that regard. Take Nintendo for instance, does anyone really think that the original Nintendogs and Pokemon games had to be released in three separate versions? As for Sony does anyone really think that their hands were tied and Blu-Ray was the only way they could have HD games on PS3? No they did it to further their own bottom lines (Sony for future licensing fees).
As for Sony not charging for online, I am speculating but I wouldn't be surprised if they did it because they knew they'd get a lot of grief from consumers over paying for an inferior service at the time or simply because they chose to use it as a bullet point against the Xbox 360 and expected to recoup the costs with online microtransactions. Also people can continually bash Microsoft for the hardware problems but they have admitted it (something Sony never did with PS1 and PS2 cd/dvd drives) and are continually working to fix the problem.
I wish Microsoft would be more transparant though and show hard numbers and behind the scenes work to silence the critics.







