The Cell Processor....

[Final-Fan]

joeorc said:
the PDF is very clear in what the Cell Processor is classed as. It is indeed a C/GPU Hybrid Multi-Core processor.

that was what it is. Look I respect you and all , an as you can see English was not my strongest subject.

The very fact that this is just one PDF in quite a number of Documents that I have about this HPC processor.

There have been many speaking engagement's from many chip designer's in the field of HPC that i have had the privilege of listening to and to that end ,I do not have an Agenda at all .I am just pointing out misconception's about the Cell.

Just like the Misconception of the Wii just being 2 Game Cube's stuck together. or that The Xbox360 is far weaker than the PS3 which is not true at all. just like that the xbox360 has a more powerful Graphics capability than the ps3 which is not true at all. All thress systems Each have their strengths and weakness.

For the most part all the systems this generation spec's aside are even anyway because they all play Game's. That's what it's about is it not?

The Game's is what its about, Now for Me i like talking about the Game's and the Spec's of each of the machine's . which is why i posted what i did.There have been many on this forum that have stated that The SPE's in the Cell processor are not Core's.The truth of the matter is they are Core's other's may not agree with it but, that is their Opinion on the CELL processor an while I respect their Opinion.

I also respect that their Opinion is wrong, From the people who designed the Cell Processor in the first place. the fact that I have had to post such fact's twice on the forum, and the very same people refuse to Agree with the Chief Cell processor team's Claims is troubling in my Opinion.

because it seem's to me ,The same people have the Opinion of the Cell and no matter what the fact's are they refuse to learn something Instead they just do not care to learn about it because they do not want to learn about it .But on the same token want to give their opinion on it , and be dismissive toward anyone who has Fact's that are not just conjecture, but Fact's just the same and say no matter what their Opinion is more credible than the main people who happen to have created in this case the Cell Processor.

Like i said I respect that they have an Opinion on the Matter . But to me it just seem's they on one hand demand proof, and when its shown no matter what it's just dismissed as the person has an Agenda or a fanboy because he just so happens to have fact's about in this case the PS3 that is contrary to popular Opinion of people who have agreed that their Opinion is right an that it is this way instead of how it actually is.

just sayin

You know what, I'm just going to repost your post, but with everything pretty much fixed. 
Bold means that I fixed a single word -- be it spelling, capitalization, a one-word grammar issue, or those damned apostrophes. 
Italics means that I fixed a phrase, or some grammar, or a whole sentence -- basically anything bigger than a word. 
[Bracketed, italicized text indicates commentary.]

The PDF is very clear in what the Cell processor is classed as. It is indeed a C/GPU hybrid multi-core processor.

That is what it is.  Look, I respect you and all, and as you can see English was not my strongest subject.

The very fact that this is just one PDF in quite a number of documents that I have about this HPC processor. 

[...what?  That whole thing was an introduction:  "The very fact that this is so ... MEANS that ... what?"  Alternately, you could say "IN fact, this is just one ...."]

There have been many speaking engagements from many chip designers in the field of HPC that I have had the privilege of listening to.  In the end, I do not have an agenda at all:  I am just pointing out misconceptions about the Cell. 

["To that end" made no sense whatsoever.  I redid things in such a way that seemed consistent with what I thought you were trying to communicate.]

Just like the misconception that the Wii is just 2 GameCubes stuck together, or that the Xbox 360 is far weaker than the PS3, or that the Xbox 360 has a more powerful graphics capability than the PS3.  All three of these systems each have their strengths and weaknesses.

[Deleted the pointless phrase "which is not true at all" from items in your LIST OF MISCONCEPTIONS.  Also, since it was one sentence (or ought to have been), commas are now where two periods were.]

For the most part, all the systems this generation (specs aside) are even anyway because they all play games.  That's what it's about is it not?

The games are what it's about.  Now, for me, I like talking about the games and the specs of each of the machines, which is why I posted what I did.  There have been many on this forum that have stated that the SPEs in the Cell processor are not cores.  The truth of the matter is that they are cores; others may not agree with it, but that is their opinion on the Cell processor and, while I respect their opinion, I also respect that their opinion is wrong, according to the people who designed the Cell processor in the first place.  The fact that I have had to post such facts twice on the forum, and see the very same people refuse to agree with the chief Cell processor team's claims, is troubling in my opinion.

[Consolidated two paragraphs because the paragraph break had occurred MID-SENTENCE.  Also, while I have seen Cell (referring to the specific processor) written CELL, it's best to go for consistency rather than have it written the other way, once in your post, randomly.  Finally, I inserted "see" because otherwise that whole second part didn't fit into the sentence.  I thought the usage of "opinion" at the end, which makes us think of the earlier usage, was very neat.] 

It seems to me that these people have a particular opinion of the Cell and no matter what the facts are they refuse to learn anything:  they do not care to learn about it because they do not want to learn about it.  But at the same time they want to give their opinion on it, and be dismissive toward anyone who has facts -- not just conjecture, but facts -- and say that, no matter what, their opinion is more credible than those of the main people who happen to have created the Cell processor.

[The first part of the paragraph was just a mess.  I rewrote it in a way I felt was consistent with your opinion and which fit the rest of the sentence.  Secondly, "not just conjecture, but facts" was an interjection that you didn't tell us about (by way of punctuation) AT ALL, which I fixed; and "just the same" did not seem to be an appropriate phrase for what you were saying, and your statement seemed fine without it, so I took it out.  "In this case" was not quite as out of place, but seemed unnecessary (there aren't any other cases we're talking about, right?), so I likewise removed it.]

Like I said, I respect that they have an opinion on the matter.  But to me it just seems they on one hand demand proof, and (on the other) when it's shown, no matter what, it's just dismissed as the person having an agenda or being a fanboy, because he just so happens to have facts about (in this case) the PS3 that is contrary to popular opinion of people who have agreed that their opinion is right and that it is this way instead of how it actually is.

just sayin
[Left that one as is. ]

[P.S.] 
100% lover "nothing else matters" after that...