madskillz said:
fkusumot said:
madskillz said:
Sony's main problem is their long-term memory. They should quit living in the past. And analysts are worse because they talk of Sony's successes with the PS1 and PS2 and assume the PS3 will win in the end. That is not the case this time. Unfortunately, Sony's tactic of 'Take what we give you because you'll buy it anyhow' is not working as expected. What I find laughable is - how Sony is going in circles with the PS3. They initially had the 20gb model that was stripped down - and took it off life support almost immediately. Then, the 60gb wasn't moving as fast as they liked and they axed it. Now, the 80gb without hardware emulation is here but at a high price point - hence why they *added* the 40gb crippled. And what's really sad? The 20gb has more features! Correct me if I am wrong but ...
|
You should be a writer! That little tropus about the 20GB -> 60GB -> 80GB -> 40GB was very nice. |
LOL ... I AM a journalist! I have been writing for years, work at a real newspaper - http://www.abqtrib.com/qt3ch and recently launched a video game review site - http://www.dukecitygamerz.com (It's under MAJOR construction) On the ABQ Trib site, I write under Willie Jefferson on the main site and Mount F.U.G. on the Q-T3CH blog. Check it out and thanks a million for the props ... I am still lol on that ... |
Thanks for the heads up! You're almost my neighbor, I live in Denver. Fun reading your articles, thanks for the link.
