Mr Khan said:
I've long campaigned against the idea of the extended generation, for similar reasons. Sony and Microsoft should know that their motion solutions are not going to give them the necessary momentum against Nintendo, unless they essentially re-launch the console with the device made integral. Microsoft has already alluded to this, and i think they'll take that opportunity to make it new hardware, but hardware that is still backwards compatible and mostly interoperable with the existing 360. Sony will have to follow a similar path, especially if the Natal 360 starts paying off for Microsoft. Thus the generation will end up being of normal length, even though the launch of the next Xbox and PlayStation will not be a huge technical leap from the previous norm.
Nintendo, of course, is moving independently, and their incentive to move will come internally. When their devs feel they have exhausted the mine of possibilities with Wii, they'll push for new hardware, and i simply don't think that Nintendo will be able to come up with enough ideas to get the Wii to last beyond 2011 |
See, now you're talking specifics and that makes it harder. I do know that unless they can come up with a new experience right out of the box for a next generation console they may very well delay the release until they do. Like WoW said theres a benefit to releasing earlier than the competition but to do so you have to have a compelling product. Since I don't know precisely what that is, though I suspect that 3d might play a big part in it I cannot really comment much on it.
One thing I do know is that releasing slightly updated hardware may very well be too troublesome unless theres a specific reason for it. Say running gaming at 60FPS instead of 30 or something similar to that.
Tease.







