Call of Duty: World at War is the best-selling Wii FPS*

[Video_Game_Critic]

LordTheNightKnight said:

moondeep said:
I'm not sure why you're calling the Wii version crappy. It's one of the 2 best WWII shooters we have (my personal fav is MoH Heroes 2). Just because it doesn't have the graphics of the PS360 doesn't mean it's crappy. I think it controls quite well and is a blast to play. I personally will take other 'watered down ports' if they are like Wii WoW. I bought my Wii for a fun system with great controls, not for its graphics. If I want a certain game in high-def, I just buy it for my PC, which will always have far superior graphics to the PS360.

This generation has really lost the meaning of what truly makes a crappy game. Anything they don't like now becomes crap or shit. Or they use even worse words that for all reason should be reserved for games that are so bad you can barely play them. When Wii Music is described with the same venom as E.T. 2600, you know gamers have lost perspective of what a truly bad game is.

Moondeep:

I think graphics are one of the least important parts of the game.  Call of Duty: World at War has a stripped multiplayer feature limited to death match and the controls are not that good.  I hate dual analogue as much as anyone here, but I also hate bad Wii controls too.  "Medal of Honor: Heroes 2" and "The Conduit" are the only two FPS for the Wii with quality controls.

LordTheNightKnight:

I played E.T. for the Atari 2600.  I was too young, but my cousin owned it.  You are correct, Wii Music is infinitely better than E.T., but that is like saying something tastes better than dirt.