By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BMaker11 on 21 July 2009
Edit Thread
Kantor said:
Stan85 said:
Jalocin said:
Stan85 said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Stan85 said:
If you have a 360 then Dante is for you.

If you have a ps3 then God of War 3 is for you.

I will get Dante and Bayonetta and just watch God of War 3 on the net,cheap and effective in these times.

I Feel sorry for u bro....

My wallet is not. Trust me,God of War 3 is a system seller,but is an expensive system.

There will be tons of games to buy in 2010 and buying a ps3 for just 1 game is wrong.

I saw Uncharted,Resistance and Killzone,good games but not that great. It doesn`t have the Gears,Halo or Fable feeling to them.

So don`t be sorry for me,be happy because I will use those money for more games.

I wonder why games you watched on the internet doesn't have the same feeling to them as games you have actually played..... <.<

Come on,don`t do this... I don`t feel the need to play Uncharted,Resistance 2 and Killzone 2...Is that a bad thing?

Everybody is different and prefer different games.

God of War 3 will be the reason to have a ps3...but it`s just a singleplayer game. I will watch it and move on.

I have a lot of games to purchase,I don`t have the money to waste on just 1 game that I will play just 1 time.

And trust me,Dante will be more violent and satisfying than God of War 3 because it`s a new IP...imagine when Ninja Gaiden was released on xbox 1...what an impact...when Ninja Gaiden 2 was released,everyone said ok...good...etc.

That was because Ninja Gaiden 2 wasn't as good as the original. Tell me, how many people were saying "okay, good" when God of War II launched? Killzone 2? Red Alert 2? Jak 2? Ratchet and Clank 2? Halo 2? The only time you say that is when the game does not live up to its predecessor, as is the case, you are correct, with Ninja Gaiden 2, and arguably Resistance 2, but that's 10 pages of argument for another time.

Are you really saying Gears and Halo are better than God of War because God of War does not have multiplayer? Does a game really need multiplayer to be good? None of the Zelda games have had multiplayer, no Team ICO game, Fable didn't (the sequel did, but let's not go there), BioShock... some of the best games of all time have been single player only. As for playing it through one time, who's making you? I played through Uncharted 4 times, and Shadow of the Colossus 3 times, and those were both games that people said "had little replay value" (that is, of course, if we are counting GameSpot editors as people which is debatable, but whatever). I say if a game is good enough, what's to stop you from replaying.

You can't compare Uncharted, Resistance (ugh) and Killzone 2 to Gears, Halo and Fable if you haven't played them. A game watched is never as good as a game played- if you had played Uncharted and Killzone 2, and not Gears, Halo and Fable, you would prefer the PS3 games.

If you don't want to get a PS3, that's fine, but never doubt the power of teh C3LL. Okay?

Or it will absorb you.

OT: GoWIII...that's a no brainer. Dante's Inferno wouldn't be here if it weren't for GoW