silentmac said:
Ok well what site or magazine is less biased than IGN then? I have seen a ton of people complain that they are too lenient on Wii games... They score third party games that are geared toward their reader's demographic pretty high IMO.. For instance: The Conduit 8.6 Mad World 9.0 Okami 9.0 Zack & Wiki 9.0 RE4: 9.0 PES 2k8 8.6 etc. Most people instantly give Nintendo first party titles 9.0 or better and sometimes this is deserved and sometimes it isn't. Now most sites also tend to over rate games if they have great visual on the HD consoles as well... I agree they could be more subjective with their reviews but honestly they are far more Wii friendly than just about any other gaming publication. |
Exactly. Wii games 'that are geared toward their reader's demographic'. In other words, they upscore the games they think the readers like and ignore/downscore the others. Now yes, there's some blatant anti-Nintendo sites out there. But IGN isn't without its faults and bias is my main point. And on the whole, I'm someone who thinks you shouldn't listen to a reviewer to be your judge of wither to buy a game anyway. With so many forms of media, previews and youtube/gametrailers now adays, there's no need to read a 2-4 page bias and opinionated summary of a game (which the reviewer never finished in the first place).











