Soriku said:
Kasz216 said:
Zlejedi said:
KylieDog said:
I think jumping platform after only one game is stupid. Should have done a VC2 on PS3, then maybe move to other platforms.
It isn't even a spin off is it, is an actual sequal? Makes it more stupid.
Kind of a middle finger to fans completely jumping ship after only one game. Not like it went multiplat after one game, that isn't bad at all...it completly switched platforms and cuts off fanbase. |
Not really it makes perfect sense to release VC 1 on PS3, then make second one on PSP and go back with third one for PS3 again this time with much higher userbase. Plus PSP is really cheap enought that buying it for single game isn't such a problem for fanatical fanbase (and VC fanbase is fanatical no doubt:) ) |
That sounds... extremely farfetched.
I mean... can you name on game that's followed a similar precedent?
|
People are going to say MH, but then again VC is story driven while MH is not.
|
But the PSP ones weren't sequels. They were upgraded ports... no?
It was MH1 and MH1G
Then MH2 and MH2G
Now MH3Tri and (probably) MH3G.(PSP)
Not MH1 and MH2.
This would be more like if DQ 11 was for DS.
Which it may be... i believe Nintendo threw them a moneyhat to put it on Wii instead of DS... but Sony throwing money at them to put on PSP instead of PS3 is a ridiculious concept.
