Onyxmeth said:
My reply falls completely in line with what the OP is talking about thank you very much. He's putting 100% blame on third parties for not creating a "hardcore userbase", but I've clearly stated that since that release lists encompases Japan only, it's only relevant to that region, since Nintendo does not support the US and EU regions in the same fashion. Considering 99% of this site is likely living amongst those two regions and doesn't understand Japanese, I'd say it's significant to the topic at hand. Edit: Forgot one more thing. Since this is not supposed to be about the distributor, and about what Nintendo has been up to, why are games on this list that they didn't develop? Aren't we trying to prove that Nintendo's teams are hard at work here, and not the distributor? |
You cannot be serious...
But if you are, why not create the topic you want to talk about? As I said, the creator has made his point and nothing you have said will dispute his point at all. All you can do is find some bogus John in an attempt to strike at thee integrity of the topic. Your actions are see-through and unless you are actually willing to make the topic you want to speak about, your contribution is still at 0.
All games count. Not just games for one region, by the way. A game made, or published in one region is still a game made or published and has every right to count. It is not like the rules used were not applied to both consoles to create a, "unfair advantage." And (I did skim the topic so not positive about it but) someone in this topic already did exactly what you are asking for. And I am now done trying to understand your methods or logic.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000







