Slimebeast on 13 July 2009
| KungKras said: This is the first time I have heard patcher being reasonable. first, Microsoft operates very different from other companies, their priority is to make custoumers, not money. As long as they gain market share they can pour almost infinate money into a project to take over an industry. Microsoft could afford to sell a Natal that costs $200 to make for about $50 if it means that they can stomp Nintendo and become industry leaders and make up for the losses later. |
You sound reasonable too, and I would believe it if it wasn't for the fact that it's practically impossible to monopolize the console and gaming market, and I think MS knows this too.
There's a huge difference between fending off Sony and conquering the whole market like you describe.
Can you tweak your theory a lil bit? To make it sound more believable lol.
