dougsdad0629 on 09 July 2009
| jlauro said: If anything, IGN caused HVS to concentrate on things that IGN wanted making for a lower review to those critics they didn't cater too. It all balances out... Most people who bought the game think it deserves an 80-90. Personally I'm surprised there wasn't some 100s, as some magazines seem to give those out to less worth titles... If IGN rate it a 95, then you might be able to claim bias. It's not like they gave it the highest rating. http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=64101 has it at 9.0/10 bringing it back into the green on metacritic. |
I give this game a 70, tops. Didn't really like it all that much. Will probably trade it in as early as tomorrow and get something worthwhile like Grand Slam Tennis which is what I should have gotten in the first place instead of this overhyped game.
Keep this in mind when reading what I type...
I've been gaming longer than many of you have been alive.
