S.T.A.G.E. on 09 July 2009
| rodrz34 said: 2) at least it's much better than nothing like on 360. Or is it 'cool' somehow to have no browser ? Is internet useless now ? 3) there are millions of users who use Home, but yeah it's just starting. Once again, all the 360 ahs to compete are childish Mii ripoffs (avatars) 4) 'most FPS are better with 16 players' ah ah nice one. Or even better with 2 like Gears ? Or even 1 ? Oflline I mean. Seriously... Huge scale battles and objectives are only possible in huge scale games, see planetside on PC, Resistance 2 or MAg on PS3. Once again less is better on Live? Okay 6) Yes they are from the 01/01/09. Sony made them mandatory. Please tell me which 2009 games don't have trophies or was it a lie ? 7) yeah but you have more downtime, more lag, no blueray, no huge scale battles (64+ players), no web browser, no Home, no Vidzone, plenty of ads everywhere and you pay for that. All in all, I'll keep the PSN I guess. So will the majority of us (gamers I mean) apparently since there are apparently more PSN accounts than Live Gold accounts. |
The 360 isn't an internet browser. You question too soon as Microsoft made Internet Explorer. It's quite obvious that Microsoft wants to focus on the Xbox Live experience, instead of doing everything but like Sony. This is why Sony screws up these things. They don't understand how to appeal on that greater level of closeness online. When you are with your party of friends on live, you literally are. It is the greatest substitute for them not being in the same room, whether it be playing videogames or watching movies together or just voice chatting (without a need for a phone I might add).
