Let me sumurrize and honestly try and explain your own post so that you might see yourself in a mirror:
I started to respond with knowledge but decided I couldn't. I missed the topic and was going to flame someone other than the topic.
I'm better than you, honestly, go out and get experience, and come back to debate with more intelligence. I insult you without any real reason. I can't explain it to you, so, therefore you are no good at debating even though I can not honestly explain why.
I'm so anti-fanboy that I don't even know when an anti-fanboy appears, like a blood-thirsty ant that makes no sense.
------
Notice how my post made absolutely no reference to anything actually stated or found to be true? Go take some english courses if you wish to present anything useful, seriously. I can state exacly what you say, in all its glory, justa s well as you have. Only, there's nearly no indication, if you take out the names, who exactly you're referring to, only because there's no EVIDENCE presented.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
