Are you rating graphics based on what the wii is capable of? art direction? or technicality? Cause its a different score depending.
If you rate it across all consoles, graphics are maybe a 3/5
If you rate the art direction ok maybe a 3-3.5/5 (gets better later in the game)
If you rate it for technical graphical acheivements on the wii compared to only other wii games its a 4-4.5/5 overall.
This is an example of why review scores are all over the board. There's no consistency between reviewers. I used to have so much faith in metacritic but I now realize its flaws. Not to say it isn't useful at times.
Most people though could care less about the Conduit's single player. Reviewers need to spend equal if not more time playing the multiplayer than the single player because that is how the development time seems to have been split. The multiplayer map designs are great. The controls are great. There's little to stand up to the game on that front and its simply pure fun. Playing PC FPS I never thought I'd enjoy a console FPS. I hated dual analog when I knew I could rape so bad in Quake 3 Arena. Well, here I am raping noobs online on my wii. Hell yeah its a good time.
