Facher, wow, I know how you feel where the person on the opposite side is incapable of understanding the argument at hand. Words of Wisdom, let me try to simplify it for you.
OP said "Wii doesn't have enough variety to appeal to everyone."
Facher said "Could you explain somewhere where it seems to be weak?"
You said "Not everyone likes Mario and Zelda."
Facher said "So what? That's not all the Wii offers."
It's simple really. I dislike Halo, does that mean the XBox has nothing for me? No.
On the second point, OP said "Motion controls won't be liked by everyone."
Facher said "So what? There are other ways to play."
You said "But not everyone likes motion controls."
Facher said "And...?"
You said "NOT EVERYONE WANTS MOTION CONTROLS"
There are other ways to play. Simply because motion control is available doesn't mean it has to be used. The Wii has at its disposal both classic and wiimote style configurations. This allows for either motion controls or traditional set ups to be made. If people don't like motion controls, they can always use regular.
For the third point, it goes something like this: OP says "Some people won't like the Wii."
Facher says "I, personally, have yet to meet someone who doesn't like the Wii."
You say "I HAVE met people who don't like the Wii."
Facher says "Meh, it's all anecdotal evidence so it really has no weight as it can't be used."
You say "YOUZ DONT BELEVE MEZ?"
Facher says "It's not that I don't believe you, it's that it can't be proven."
We can make up all the anecdotal crap we want, but unless we can prove it, it means absolutely nothing. I guess the classic internet meme "Pics or it didn't happen" is pretty applicable here.
