| Words Of Wisdom said: Are we talking about games still, or plumbing? You did know Mario was Mexican right? I never said I agreed or disagreed with motion-control. If you re-read accurately and outloud you might notice that the OP is stating since Wii has motion control it is doomed, because not everyone likes motion control. This is like saying, since I hate football video games (despite loving football) I can not possibly like PS3 or XBox360. Why? Because they have football games! (Gag gag gag, I hate hate hate, therefore I will not buy a PS3 XBox360). This is silly. Why? Because that also means I would be hypocritical in saying this, since Wii games also consist of football games. The OP is ignoring that, and apparently you've ignored the OP entirely as well, getting back at the actual argument from HIM, not me, that motion control means a console is doomed. It was a simple statement "motion controls are not going to be liked by every gamer, and that's because the Wii-mote does not work for all genre's." You've made far too much of it. The first part is undeniable. The second part is arguable at best. I say this, you say that. I say I've met another dozen people who love Wii, who's to say I'm wrong? Or right? OP says what he wants, I can say what I want too. But, you have to go back to the points, not the selective words you wish to read. The points. Um... now you're just rambling. Your arguments are starting to run out a steam. Think on it for a while and come back. I'm enjoying this. |
Right right... that's why I haven't heard a constructive reply from you for at least a post now. If you can't come up with an actual argument other than "you're out of steam, you lose" comment then according to you I haven't lost steam, just lost the need to have any more.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.







