Some people dont seem to understand the content of this thread. They only read "MS profits" and "PS3 didnt", and think this is a bash on Sony or a celebration of MS. This thread is nothing of the sort!
This is just Squilliams way of saying that MS made a smart move by cuting the price since it made them more money than if they had not. And that MS would make more money once more with a price cut than if they didnt.
The PS3 is just there to showcase- and help draw some kind of conclusion to where sales and sales % during a set time frame would've been for MS if they hadn't cut the price.
Atleast that's how i understand it. But english isnt my native language so i might've got lost in the translation. Am i right Squilliam?







