Valhalla Knights

[outlawauron]

Seraphic_Sixaxis said:

outlawauron said:
1. It's an Action RPG.

2. XSEED just brought the game to America. I would have bought the second one rather than the first though.

3. Well, it's huge. Takes forever to beat and has tons of replay value because of ad-hoc multiplayer.

4. The custimazation isn't deep, but you do have that option.

5. No.

The game isn't very good. I played it for about 10-12 hours before I finally put it down. It's very hard as well.

{~Good Answer's.~}

So then there is a 2nd one?

Well, i didn't know this else i would have checked for a 2nd one.

Crap, seems the custimazation seems weaker then Phantasy and Hunter...

And no DLC to boot?

I don't understand how an ARPG could be THAT bad, but oh well... for $12 it cant be THAT horrible, how IS the 2nd one then?

@Xxain- The hell?... that means wii's getting the 3rd one? Shyte bringing all these former PSP exclusives to wii is blasphemy...

The second added an additional race, more missions, a tighter combat system, better graphics, and a improved story.

It's a better game easily, but the core of the games are still similar. The game is fun if you have someone to play with you. It also has a very, very deep class sytem, but they throw it all away and force you grind like nuts to get anything out of it.