crumas2 said:
They're making money, staying profitable, etc. Who says they have to address the market in the way you deem appropriate to be "good game developers"? Sounds like Blizzard is a REALLY poor developer, as that company refuses to touch any console. Admit it... you're frustrated that Valve doesn't want to invest heavily in developing for the PS3. It's not that you think they're not good at developing games.
|
Not really.
I could say I support gaming companies like Bioware, Blizzard, etc that make opposing exclusive games for other consoles I don't own. Its just that I dont own any of their games(cuz i dont use or have the systems). Yet the point is I can respect their work ethic. I don't hear THOSE companies complaining about consoles being too hard to develop for yatta yatta. I much rather they skip the excuses. If you dont want to make a game on a particular console, fine, just say so. Don't constantly be trying to make it seem like somethings wrong with that console tho when its really your programmers are elementary level at best for gaming.
To me it seems like they just want to do whatever uses the least amount of effort, a quality not becoming of a good game developer. They make millions of dollars every title yet they refuse to get more staff members? They just dont want to grow for some reason.
And I have never been interested in a Valve game other then Team Fortress. They just don't appeal to me as developers that way. I know plenty of other PS3 owners do/or at least did find their games interesting though.
Greatness Awaits
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)