By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik on 03 July 2009
Edit Thread
xax said:
richardhutnik said:
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
i'll go with user score which is 8.9

you can say whatever shit you want about user reviews, but the only fanboys here are the reviewers that will never admit that one great 3rd party Wii exclusive exist

Do you consider the likes of Boom Blox, World of Goo (Wii console only, and PC), Tiger Woods 10 (The control mechanism makes it unique, and it has gotten the highest ratings for the Wii),  Little King's Story (as of now, Wii exclusive), and Zack & Wiki to not be worth used as examples?  Just because they aren't your traditional "core" games, why should they get shorted?

sure there are some that take the cake, but I think he means beside the rare exception third party games don't get what they deserve

If that is the strength of the Wii, then why would people expect different?  What is see is every single blasted third-party non-party games is being hyped up as some sort of equalizer, to make the Wii seem like a "real" console that has everything every gamer would want.  By the way, I don't think Zack and Wiki and Little King's Story are party games.  World of Goo isn't either (it is a puzzle game).

And Nintendo has proven a range of games besides the Party games out there.  They have gotten good reviews.  I am sure if third-party were competent enough, it would happen to.  And I am frustrated by this, "Exclusive" handle on it.  Due to it, RE 4 for the Wii can't be mentioned.