IxisNaugus on 03 July 2009
If its a ridiculously high expectation for you, its not for me. When the game doesnt meet my expectation i called it a flop. The reason i tought it would be AAA title was because it was most hyped FPS game on the wii.
And i am not gonna correct someone EVERY time he\she says something wrong...
And i am not gonna correct someone EVERY time he\she says something wrong...
Of course it is a ridiculously high expectation. In fact it was nigh impossible. You could not have possibly thought this game had a chance of matching metascores with the best shooters available on the PS3/X360. It does not matter what HVS had done, it just wasn't going to happen all things considered.
If your expectation for the game was to have a metascore of the same number or higher as Killzone 2, you were doomed from the beginning. Why do you have such an expectation anyway, it was quite clear this game would never be rated as highly as acclaimed shooters and the reasons root deeper than the fact that it is just not as good. You should read sensible reviews for the game, it is far from a flop, but you had it down as "if it gets lower than X score, it's a flop" so it is quite clear this game is a failure to you.
Yes, this was the most hyped FPS on the Wii, if anything, you should have used this as a reason why it would not reach a metascore as high as Killzone 2. That said, i'm pretty sure most people kept things sensible within the hype, i know i wasn't shouting out "best FPS ever!", hell i didn't see anyone make this sort of claim. Everybody said it would be a great looking, great playing FPS on the Wii... which it is. This garbage about The Conduit revolutionizing the genre or pushing it to new heights is bullshit, no one said it was going to do these things and if anyone truly thought it would well then they really do need a reality check.
And i don't know about you but I'd rather simply correct someone then stick the fanboy finger up their nose.
![]()
How technical is your game?









