Nintendo's 'Natal' ?

[ironman]

Dazkarieh said:

ironman said:

Dazkarieh said:

ironman said:

Yeah, thats what fanboys are saying, but it's not true. NATAL is the Eyetoy ON CRACK!!! How well does you 5 year old phone recognise your voice? And since when did the eyetoy track full body motion in 3D? Sorry old chap, you are going to have to try a differant argument.

Look, I'm not going to discuss point by point... you can call it an evolution, whatever! Realkisticaly, in terms of use, the only thing Natal does that Eyetoy can't is to identify different people. Everything else is software (voice recognition, facial recognition, material, so on). But if you want to think it's a complete revolution and you're happy with it, it's fine ;)

XD you were the one that brought up your cell phone, heck, most cellphones still have buggy VR software, so quite frankly, that doesn't apply here. Also, The eyetoy doesn't have a second camera and therefore, could not "see" in 3D no matter how good the software is. I never said it was a complete revolution. Its quite obviouse that I am saying it is an improvement from my "NATAL is the Eyetoy ON CRACK!!!" statement. See, my point is this, NATAL is VERY different both software wise, and hardware wise, from anything else on the VG market today. It is really just sad that you have to justify the falure that is the eyetoy, by saying "well, it COULD do that." Just because it could do things, doesn't mean it will...or does. So let's stick to what they DO do.

Don't you get that the technology is not important? What's important is the use they'll give it. Eyetoy is a faillure not because of the technology, but because of the use they give it. And Natal still as to show to what it was made for (well, unless it is to talk with a kid - sick frightning thing that, of course, won't work as Molineaux said - or to defend balls).

So, what you say about Eyetoy is applied to Natal. It doesn't matter what it can do. I don't want Natal to navigate over the menus. Hell, my problem with Natal is that I don't know why I want it for. Nothing they showed is slightly interesting to me.

If the technology is so unimportant, then why are you arguing about it? It's just stupid to counter my argument by saying Eyetoy could do the things that NATAL does. The fact of the matter is that the eyetoy cannot do the things NATAL does because first of all, it does not have the same hardware, and second of all, it doesn't have the software.

Yes, it does matter what NATAL can do, if it was unable to do things better than the Eyetoy, it would fail because it's just another eyetoy. The fact that you don't want NATAL to navigate the menus is a personal issue and cannot be applied to any argument. thats like me saying "Dang, I don't want Blu ray...so I guess I won't buy a PS3." do you see how stupid and petty that is? And how does that appoly to ANYBODY else?

Now, You have a sick mind my friend, why else would you cry "pedophile" when you see Milo? I mean, do you really think, since you may have fantasies over some little boy in a video game, that everybody else will? Thats just sick!

NATAL was shown to the Press, it worked exactly as it was supposed to (just because it's not true A.I. people are freaking out? WTF) It fools most people into believeing that MILO is an advanced form A.I. It was also shown to play Breakout, and Burnout. MS plans to make Halo and COD playable with NATAL. They will also be puching a lot of cool apps for it. You really shouldn't be underestimating NATAL, you sould end up eating a ton of crow that way.