By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rainbird said:
silentmac said:

^
Thats great but how do great in depth gaming news and sales articles make up for reviews that clearly aren't in line with most gamer's opinion or even other reviewers. If it were that their scale is just more harsh, I would give them a break, but even accounting for a tougher scale, they underrate alot of good games.  Still, if they back them up with fact, I am ok with it for the most part.

Reviews should never be inline with anyone apart from the reviewer themselves, it's an opinion. And as for the whole argument about supposedly not-so-great games scoring higher than supposedly great games, it's complete bullshit. A game isn't given a score depending on how it did compared to one game, but on its own merits. If a reviewer feels a game is worth a 9, but many people think that this game could never score above MGS4, then that's just a matter of their tastes being different.

I'm not so sure this applies to The Conduit when you check the reviews.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."