| Vetteman94 said: @ selnor I cant agree with your last statement, not every FPS and TPS should have co-op. Too many great games would actually be ruined with the introduction of co-op into them. The first Resistance is a perfect example of this, Nathan Hale was almost always on his own throughout the entire game, but they tacked on co-op. Now during co-op he had some random soldier following him, who oddly never showed up in the cutscenes. |
How does that ruin the game? You complete it single player don't you? So you get the experience as intended. Just because when your mates there it has an extra soldier which doesn't show up in cutscenes has no bearing on your single player experience. I'm sure the mate that gets to play the awesome game with you wont complain. In fact you both will probably have a laugh and get tactical.
So you would rather have just the single player. Rather than have the same single player ( with less graphics ) and the addition of coop. You get the same game, just with added awesomeness. Thats the point. It doesn't ruin anything for your experience. It enhances it when your mates come round. Because they dont have to sit there twiddling their thumbs. Going "yeah looks great. Can we please play a 2 player game now?" The amount of times I sat there watching KZ2 at my mates getting bored was to many. Thats exactly why I still havent finished it yet. If it was Coop I would've finished in 4 sittings at my mates. Instead we have played many other games that are coop much more than KZ2 or Uncharted for example.
