OK I have a Question. Why do people care so much about reviews? EVERYONE has different likes and dislikes over the same game. I love the Conduit, It is exactly what I thought I was buying. Has pretty good graphics. Has solid MP.great controls.a ok story,and for me at least has Made me respect HVS for the great effort they put into it. I would give it somewhere in the 80's as it is a good game and has left me wanting to see what more they can do.
Now, say a game like Halo. This game has sold millions. I have only played it a few times,so bare with me here. It is on a completely different level. Controls different, different budget,etc,etc. Is it a bad game? No, it is not as you can tell by the sales and the love of it from its fans.
Now, if I am a reviewer and I was to compare the two can you guess which would rank higher for me?
Of course I would Probably pick the Conduit. Why? The controls. My whole time comparing both would mostly be based on that. Now take someone who has played Halo a lot more then me. Most likely they would pick Halo to be on top. Whats a good reason for them. The Controls! The Graphics, etc etc. the same reason I love would love The conduit more. is the same reasons they would love Halo more.
Now, I know reviewers are at least suppose to? Review the game for what the game is. Not what it is compared to a game they already love. But can anyone,anyone at all not have in the back of there mind what they would compare it to? I would lean towards no. When I put this in I was thinking o boy! I hope this is as good as Perfect Dark! Is it fair? No not really as they are two different companies. One I loved and one that I am new to.
Anyways that is my little rant. Give this game to someone who likes FPS and in my mind the big like/dislike would be based on the controls or what gamethey would use to compare it to.
