difference in reviewers and gamers score in Wii and Xbox360/Ps3 games

[dark_gh0st_b0y]

Luney Tune said:
www.gamefaqs.com is the biggest gaming site on the Internet. They have a fairly strict policy regarding reader reviews. Reviews have to be of a certain lenght, and they must be approved by an admin before they are posted.

So let's see how Wii owners feel about these games once all the trolls and fanboys are kicked out:

The Conduit:
Metacritic 7.0
GameFaqs 7.8 (4 reviews)

Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World:
Metacritic 6.7
GameFaqs 7.5 (24 reviews)

Mario Kart Wii:
Metacritic 8.0
GameFaqs 7.7 (92 reviews)

Mario Party 8:
Metacritic 6.4
GameFaqs 7.4 (48 reviews)

MadWorld:
Metacritic 8.3
GameFaqs 8.2 (20 reviews)

SoulCalibur Legends:
Metacritic 5.5
GameFaqs 6.1 (10 reviews)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl:
Metacritic 9.0
GameFaqs 8.6 (211 reviews)

Out of these seven games, 4 were rated slightly higher by GameFaqs readers while 3 were rated lower. Draw your own conclusions.

i didn't know about this site, it is more fair, but it's still just 1 site, not every Wii owner cares to write a review, it's more practical to post the score

gamer score of faqs for SoulCalibur Legends and Mario Party 8 are not that far away, so i don't think gamestats are like only 10s and 0s, and they include faqs reviews as well, i guess

still, the Conduit deserves more than 7.0 and Tales 2, more than 6.7, for god's sake, Mario Party 8 as well, even SoulCalibur Legends

i really don't which if the two to trust, gamestats or gamefaqs

because of you count only ign.com (where most 10s and 0s are) and gamefaqs score, the user score for Conduit for example is 8.2 or smth, how does it reach 8.9 on gamestats!?

same for Symphonia 2