| MaxwellGT2000 said: you're the one that started the derailment and kept replying, I'm not singling you out I'm talking to the person that started the whole situation and doesn't let it die. There is no argument to be had here, you stated you don't like customization, that's fine, don't try to knock the game because everyone else enjoys customization, every FPS has it, it's a fact you can't deny so I don't know why you're trying to hit one game because it has it, it makes me think you're trying to stealth troll. Again I say if you have that much of a problem with customization in FPS games go out and make your own without customization, no ones stopping you, but if you're going to jump on one game for having it you might as well just say the whole genre has had it from it's beginnings on the PC. |
Before accusing someone of "stealth trolling" maybe you should read accurately what they say, or at least not twist it. I said that I despise such kind of customization indipendently from the game or hardware it applies to. Multiple times. I named Killzone 2 as an example of that, as it was a case of "feel" vs "immediate ease of use". Multiple times. I said that turning sensitivty in FPSs was brought over to consoles from PC where it was a necessity because there's no standard hardware.
My point was not that the Conduit is bad because of it. Never said that, I'm sure it's a competent game - though a "safe bet" one and a tech showcase one. But that its going overboard with control customization is not a step forward in gaming or a new idea or a bright new piece of know-how as the Malstrom post - that was the OP - suggested.
It was my opinion, it was entirely on-topic, and I had to explain and expand as people questioned me. But this is the last meta-post about my posts I want to make in this thread. They are still there for anyone to read.
As I said before, we can agree that we disagree on this point of game design, and we can go back to commenting the OP.
