dark_gh0st_b0y on 29 June 2009
| Torillian said: You want more, sure Lair - 53 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps3/lair?q=Sony NBA 07 - 63 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps3/nba07?q=Sony Afrika - 71 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps3/afrika?q=Sony now on to Nintendo Mario Party 8 - 62 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/marioparty8?q=Nintendo Wii Music - 63 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/wiimusic?q=Nintendo Link's Crossbow Training - 68 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/linkscrossbowtraining?q=Nintendo and finally Microsoft Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom - 55 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/kingdomunderfirecircleofdoom?q=Microsoft Ninety Nine Nights - 61 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/99nights?q=Microsoft Ninja Blade - 68 http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/ninjablade?q=Microsoft All of these games were published by the big three, if the sites were afraid to give games from them bad scores why would these exist? |
LoL, first you say user reviews are not accurate or they don't play the game and stuff, and now you post these
come on, are you serious, Lair for example got 6.2 user score and 5.3 press, this shows that user reviews are not a joke!
user review and gamer score is much closer in HD consoles than Wii games, that's my point
they wouldn't be so close in HD games if user score was just a joke with 0.0s and 10s from fanboys
don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^
