difference in reviewers and gamers score in Wii and Xbox360/Ps3 games

[dark_gh0st_b0y]

reviews are supposed to reflect average gamers opinion about a game, therefore giving an idea to the consumer how good a games is

accoarding to gamestats.com , reviewers opinion is much closer to HD gamers opinion, but most of the times is different from Wii gamers opinion

average reviewers do not really understand the Wii demographic, and they review Wii games accoarding to Ps3/Xbox360 hard-core gamers point of view, review system just doesn't work with Wii games i believe

 

for example:

 

The Conduit

	PRESS SCORE	7.0
	GAMER SCORE	8.9

Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the new World

	PRESS SCORE	6.7
	GAMER SCORE	9.0

Mario Kart Wii

	PRESS SCORE	8.0
	GAMER SCORE	8.8

Mario Party 8

	PRESS SCORE	6.4
	GAMER SCORE	7.5

Madworld

	PRESS SCORE	8.3
	GAMER SCORE	9.2

Overlord: The Dark Legend

	PRESS SCORE	7.2
	GAMER SCORE	9.2

Soul Calibur Legends

	PRESS SCORE	5.5
	GAMER SCORE	6.9

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

	PRESS SCORE	9.0
	GAMER SCORE	9.3

 

but in Xbox360/Ps3 games, press score is much close to gamer score, or much higher in many cases

 

Killzone 2

	PRESS SCORE	9.3
	GAMER SCORE	8.9

SoulCalibur IV

	PRESS SCORE	8.5
	GAMER SCORE	8.4

Resident Evil 5

	PRESS SCORE	8.6
	GAMER SCORE	8.8

Street Fighter IV

	PRESS SCORE	9.2
	GAMER SCORE	8.7

Grand Theft Auto IV

	PRESS SCORE	9.6
	GAMER SCORE	8.9

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

	PRESS SCORE	9.4
	GAMER SCORE	9.2

Halo 3

	PRESS SCORE	9.4
	GAMER SCORE	8.5