elprincipe, excellent reply.
If they're gonna call it 'climate change' (yes I know they've already started to do that since a few years now, im not an ignorant fool) it's just stupid. They can keep on with their cherry picked observations and make big news out of it and scare people. And people will just keep waiting for the 'big catastrophy' (which of course isn't something concrete, it's a fuzzy picture about something 'bad').
As soon as some random science expedition have measured some local penguin population to have decreased it's gonna keep feeding alarming news in the media.
And they're already started indoctrinating people with these 'trigger effects' and 'feedback mechanisms' (I dont have the tools right now to explain that mechanism, and there exists a more common phrase for it) that basically say that you don't have to observe a certain parameter rise anymore after a certain point, because it has already triggered some bad event that in turn will escalate through positive feedback mechanisms.
Im not questioning that such trigger-escalation mechanisms actually exixst, because they're common in the natural world on all levels, but in this case with 'climate change' this argument will be used to death as a trick whenever they lack the 'hard data' of no rise in temperature or sea levels.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
