Man made global warming myth is one of the biggest scandals in science history and politics of post-WWII.
I can't believe how people beleiev in it when the basic data dont even support it.
It's just ridicilous that industralitation has gone on for 150 years, but the warming only happened in the last 30-35 years, and then eve n started to stabilize in the last 7 years (!). Of course warming cycles happen over hundreds of years on Earth, we all knew that since ages ago - and the overall trend is rite now a slight warming - but the correlation to human activity is laughable.
I work as a medical doctor myself, I know how hard it is to interpret scientific data and draw conslusions about causality.
If you want a good example to put this in perspective, think about this:
- we actually still don't know such a basic thing as what is worse for the human body: eating a lot of sugar or a lot of fat. It's HUGELY debated in the medical proffession. Such a basic thing is still unsolved (when there exists only 3 basic energy sources for the human body, carbo hydrates (=sugar), fat and proteins). Dont you think this debate should have been solved by now, if these causality connections were so easy as the Climate change zealots claim, when there's 6 billion test objects on earth to prove your hypothesis on?
My patients ask me: 'what should I cut down on, sugar or fat?' and I can't give them a recommendation because no one actually knows! (but gazillions of 'experts' claim to know of course).
But here come all these global warming zealots and claim that of course the question whether human activity is causing global warming is settled! And that you're a heretic or moron or whatever if you dismiss it or even just question that claim.
Think about it.
