outlawauron on 24 June 2009
| Rath said: 1). The BBC at least has a very neutral tone in its news articles, it just reports news. 2). Comparing somebodies positive facetime to Bush is foolish as Bush is already considered to be a fairly poor president. http://www.c-span.org/PresidentialSurvey/Overall-Ranking.aspx Thats the latest poll of historians. He doesn't exactly have a great rating there. 3). Obama is more popular with Americans than G.W.Bush. Therefore perhaps he gets more positive stories because he is actually (in the eyes of the majority of Americans) a better president than G.W.Bush. |
Well, that list is complete bull. What did George Washington do, since 2000, to go up a place?
And President Bush had great ratings at the start of his presidency as well.







