D_Boy on 24 June 2009
Reviews are good and everything...but I still don't understand what makes reviewers more qualified to judge a game than your average gamer? A bit of gaming history perhaps...but that's it. These reviews should be taken as loose guidelines...not to live by them. Some reviewers are also clown shoes...and suck at reviewing because all they do is bash the crap out of all the negatives and skim past the positives. A balanced unbiased review should list the positives and negatives in a logical order, and base their decision on that. Also, mentioning another console in a review is unprofessional, and makes them sound like a whiny fanboy.
