theRepublic said:
radioioRobert said:
From the Gamepro reviewer's twitter: https://twitter.com/taelurkim
Quote:
My mistake was forgetting the passing of the Internet Opinion Act which outlawed opinions on the Internet. I wish I'd voted no now. Haha, thanks? I'd try and respond to all the criticism but I'd have better luck draining the ocean with a teaspoon.
|
This guy has NO CLUE why people are upset. Opinions are fine, but they need to be defensible. I could be of the opinion that the earth is flat, but that is in no way defensible.
His assertion that the graphical gap between The Conduit and Goldeneye is less than the gap between Halo 3 and Halo or Killzone 2 and Killzone is not defensible.
His constant insults of the Wii for an exclusive Wii game are in no way defensible. In the same vein, his praise of the hardware of the 360, PS3, and to a lesser extent PC are out of place in a review for an exclusive Wii game.
At the start of one paragraph, he claims the controls are "terrible" and then in the last sentence of the same paragraph says, "I played with the default and was absolutely happy with it." It goes without saying that contradictions are not defensible.
He complains about the mapping of two functions to motion controls, without mentioning that you can completely customize all control options. He could have mapped those functions to buttons. Leaving that out of the review, or more likely not spending enough time with the game to find the option menu, is not defensible.
Not playing multiplayer of a game made primarily for the multiplayer, is not defensible.
This was easily the worst review I have ever read.
|
