| yo_john117 said: I just have one question regaurding the bundled games fr the 360 that sold millions more because of bundles. And that question is this. Doesn't MS still pay Activision for thsoe bundled games?? if so that would still mean activision got way more profit for those games on the 360 then on the PS3. And if thats true the bundles argument is moot. |
The point here is future expectation, because unless MS choose to bundle another activision game, the product cannot be use to measure sale trend. And considering this entire thread is about PS3 development viability as compared to the 360, that's a very important point. Those game cannot set standard for future games Activision publishes unless MS opens the wallet and do another deal.
Have a look at the more recent Activision game and you'll see that they generally fall into the 3:2 ratio of sale if there is no external influence.
Of course, this doesn't account for MS's deep pocket, but I'd imagine that its in Activision's best interest to continue to develop for the PS3. Without the PS3, MS might not be as generous anymore ;)
