| coolestguyever said: lol I love how they throw in "probably" because they have no proof there isn't a God. Just like theres no proof of the big bang theory and no proof of evolution. |
FAIL...
Here's a tip, stop reading creationist websites exclusively for your science information, I can tell you have because this statement could have been copy and pasted from one. The proof for both evolution and the big bang is abundant and true.
I always try to see both sides of an argument in researching and so I visit creationist websites to see what they say on the science part, and I just read crap like "It's just a theory" (these people have no clue theory =/= fact) and "there's NO evidence" (Often when A LOT exists). It seems most spend more time trying to poke holes in the scientific theories that don't conform to their answer than they do offering evidence for themselves. When you have to do that you have to start questioning the answers, I would in that situation.
The difference between atheists and theists is that atheists have no devotion to their answers, all they care about is that the answer is true to what they can best predict from the testing and evidence. If a scientist found conclusive evidence that the earth is not 4.55 billion years old but 10 Billion years old then I as an atheist would agree with the new number. But in the same situation a young earth creationist would start with answer and the evidence proving an older earth would be something they would have to reject.
Your post showed a lot of this I'm afraid.
