By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 13 June 2009
Edit Thread
Esa-Petteri said:
Samus Aran said:
Esa-Petteri said:
95+, simply because reviewers are biased.

Yeah, biased towards HD consoles and that's why they give wii games always lower scores except first party Nintendo games :) 

The fact SMG got 97% was because it was great and not because biased reviews. Why bother posting in the nintendo section if you're never going to post something nice. 

Yeah, they were just like Halo 3, GTA 4 and many other great HD-games.

 

Oh, is there a rule that you have to worship nintendo to post here? Please, show me that rule. :)


There's one problem with your logic though. Most people who own gta4 here think it's overrated, but most people who own super mario galaxy think it's one of the greatest games ever made. That's why Super Mario Galaxy certainly deserves that 97% on metacritic and I find it sad that you don't think so. Have you even played and beat this game to make a judgement like that? I don't think so. 

I've played gta4 and it was a good game, but it felt like a gimped down version of gta san andreas in some ways.

You don't have to worship Nintendo, but posting bad stuff about them everytime you post here is just stupid. If you hate Nintendo this much and the wii then just ignore this Nintendo section. The number of times you were banned just further proves my point. The only thing I want to show you is the Sony section. Go post there.