forevercloud3000 said:
Lord Flashheart said:
forevercloud3000 said:
Lord Flashheart said:
forevercloud3000 said:
disolitude said:
richardhutnik said:
Microsoft isn't just interested in Sony. They also now want to go after Nintendo. It would be presumptive that Microsoft would base its pricing strategy on what Sony does alone. If they feel they can gain on Nintendo by cutting prices, they will. |
Like Richard here said...
Besides, market for these HD consoles is pretty much the same.
Xbox 360 advantage - attractive price, great and cheap back catalog of games, things like netflix
PS3 advantage - bluray, Playstation brand name, some big exclusives released this year
|
What is so aggrevating to me is that technically PS3 already had....
-Netflix
-Facebook
-Twitter
-Motion sensing camera
but somehow these things are new when coming to 360 0_o? WTF?
now we also have
-Vidzone
-Youtube
-Pretty much any site available on the interwebs
-no fee for any of it except Netflix but thats just the standard
-etc.
Sigh......this is why I say the general consumer is stupid.......
|
So the Natal is simply a motion sensing camera like the eyetoy?
Sigh.........this is why I say that fanboys are stupid........
Also with your sig should you be questioning anyones elses for being flaimbiat?
|
If you actually did some research you would know that the Natal is doing nothing the PSEye has not already shown it can do. MILO? See Eyedentify for PSEYE revealed countless years ago. Look at Sony's conference. The Motion sensing is not just with the wands, its with the already existing PSEYE!!! PSEye has voice recognition, it has motion sensing, it has depth perception. What else did you think was reading those wands on SOny's conference?
Yea, so maybe you shouldn't speak anymore before you only further embarass yourself....
|
You're asking if i have done research?
That's rich.
If you have you would know that the pseye reacts to colour changes and movement so is limited to 2d (no depth perception or why do its games need marked cards to show it where to put its nintendogs?) and is simply on level with the xbox vision and thats about it wheras Natal see colour changes, DEPTH (3D) using two camera and IR, voice recognition, facial recognition
You've really shown yourself up here, pseye has depth perception? like you said it needs wands to read 3d but Natal does it by itself.
Pseye needs a well lit room but natal can work in very dark rooms thanks to the IR it has. You knew that didn't you?
Guess not from reading your comments.
saying Natal is just like Pseye is like saying the Wiimote is simply sixaxis.
|
What does it matter the method if they both get the same thing done? PSEye uses light and color. Natal uses IR signal. The fact of the matter is the PSEYE was here first and came standard with many of these already existing capabilities(facial recognition, voice recognition, etc) proven by tech demos and the like years before. Yea, the PSEYE, when junctioned with motion controllers, can read 3D space and movement. Point? It still does it. Thats using the PSEYE and the controllers can do that.
The uniform spherical shape and known size of the lights also allows the system to determine the wands' distances from the PlayStation Eye through the image size, thus enabling the wands' positions to be tracked in three dimensions.[5] Combined with the internal motion sensors, this allows for real-time motion capture with orientation in three dimensions with "high-precision, sub-millimeter" accuracy.[2]
My main point is that there is very little difference between the two capabilities and the PSEye could do majority of what the Natal is doing from the start.
And my hostility derives from you trying to peg me from start as some raving fanboy when I didn't even say anything wrong. NATAL and PSEYE, very little difference.
|
Honestly, the amount of inaccuracy and lack of understanding in your post is just staggering.
Suffice it to say that the buzz created by Natal both in the media, from developers and from people who have demoed it vs the completely apathy from the industry towards the PSEye should be sufficient enough to show you they are hardly the same thing.
And you have the gall to tell someone else to do their research. Maybe you should start yourself by researching what facial recognition means and what z-depth perception is.
