By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 11 June 2009
Edit Thread
Carl2291 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
kanariya said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
kanariya said:

 

Do you copy and paste your previous posts from other threads? lol

You've been saying the exact samething over and over.

 

 

Debunk it and i'll stop.

 

You'll disagree with whatever positive I say about GT anyways, what's the point to argue with a brick?


Positive? I love the GT series! Are you crazy!? I feel that Polyphony are getting a bit cocky and shouldn't take five years to create a full version of a game. This is exactly why I said the game better be a solid ten or else that five years was for nothing.

That is... so wrong.

Have you even been following the recent "Forza 3 vs Gran Turismo 5" thing? If anyone is cocky, its the definative Turn 10.

And... as stated above, PD have been working on a number of different projects in this 5 years, so how do you know that GT5 itself has taken 5 years to create?


Turn 10 stripped the game down and started from scratch and was still able to make a superior racing game to GT5 Prelude, which took the same amount of time to make. PD may have been working on a number of projects, but don't you think they could've split the teams up for that? GT5 Prelude was just a taste test for the real thing, because they couldn't finish on time. As for the timeline, I am stating a timeline from 2005 when they started the game to 2010, when GT will most likely go gold. People will be lucky to even purchase the game by Christmas. GT5 Prelude was released in 2007, so that adds up to two years. Every GT game has had added years since the creation of GT3. Look at the release dates. GT PSP was five years in the making. That game was announced in 2004 and has been talked about because of all the delays. After E3 it started recieving positive press, kind of like Alan Wake which got a bat rep because of its inability to launch on time.