I mean he makes a point but the only way he is able to do it is by not including other things. Although most of his argument is surrounded of how it is the developers fault for providing that "watered down experience".
I mean it is very true that Nintendo still seems to be the main one providing quality and solid titles although that doesn't mean third parties haven't done it. What I find even funnier is that although he talks about the Wii not getting RE5 and providing a "watered down experience", the wii version of RE4 was miles ahead of the new Resident Evil in almost every aspect of gameplay. Almost felt like a downgrade playing RE5 on the 360.
The point is good in that 3rd parties still haven't stepped up but it doesn't mean it hasn't gotten better. Nor does it mean that it is because of Wii's hardware limitations (which was a silly mention anyways cause he states that Ninty has done well so obviously its not the hardware). Poorly constructed and drafted but the main point is a good one. Too bad he's not crafty enough (or unbiased) to write it properly.
