killeryoshis said:
Orca_Azure said:
killeryoshis said:
Orca_Azure said:
@killeryoshi's post below me
It would really be unfair if the final nail in leo's coffin came from aruging with a mod. In all fairness, out of leo's 15,000 posts, only a few of the EARLY ones were ban worthy. I don't understand why the admins would be quicker to point the finger of blame and flame instead of promoting a positive environment. All leo wants to do is participate in the features that the site has to offer. Why then, would a admin rush to point out his faults rather than foster a cohesive bond that could enable a happier and more functioning site?
|
Are you too lazy to make anthor post?
OT: It is true that most people focus on the negatives. I also think that we should get a refund
from are ban if we don't do it again in a mouth but if we do it again and had are refund they take
it back and you lose 20% more VGchartz money.
|
I had to edit my post and i couldn't just leave it blank :d.
|
Yes you could its easy I do it all the time
|
really off topic, but did you know your sig says "VGvhartz" :p
on topic again: I hope leo gets a clean slate. I vouch for him
