| Orca_Azure said: @killeryoshi's post below me It would really be unfair if the final nail in leo's coffin came from aruging with a mod. In all fairness, out of leo's 15,000 posts, only a few of the EARLY ones were ban worthy. I don't understand why the admins would be quicker to point the finger of blame and flame instead of promoting a positive environment. All leo wants to do is participate in the features that the site has to offer. Why then, would a admin rush to point out his faults rather than foster a cohesive bond that could enable a happier and more functioning site? |
Are you too lazy to make anthor post?
OT: It is true that most people focus on the negatives. I also think that we should get a refund
from are ban if we don't do it again in a mouth but if we do it again and had are refund they take
it back and you lose 20% more VGchartz money.
