Smashed said:
jcp234 said:
Boutros said:
jcp234 said:
Boutros said:
jcp234 said:
Boutros said:
I am pretty sure the reason why they are not developping games on the PS3 is more than just because it's complicated...
They can't expect people to believe that in 2009. |
It's really not that hard to believe for most with the exception of a few very vocal Sony "loyalist"
|
What? I think you are avoiding the subject. I looked at your previous posts and it seems you have a problem with PS3 owners anyway. So you really think the reason why Vavle is not developping games for the PS3 is because it's «too complicated»...
|
How am I avoiding the subject? LOL Have you read my posts pertaining to the issue? Your conclusions is supported by what?
This company is basically saying the PS3 is not a viable platform for its products because of the complicated architecture and you are doubting that based on what? Sony even insists it intentionally made the PS3 architecture difficult. Are you a Valve employee?
What grounds do you have to discredit somethig being stated by Valve? Who are you again?
And I have no problem with PS3 owners. Maybe you should do more research.
Companies want to make a profit. For Valve, complicated = more expenses. Valve does not want to deal with it...get over it.
|
That's why they are lazy...
You admit they are lazy right? (based on what they said in the article)
|
So because Valve does not want to take on extra expenses to produce products for the PS3 that tranlates to lazy? Please explain how and where did you get that idea based on what I communicated?
I am not sure what you tried to do just now, but I am very well aware of what I intend to communicate. Valve does not want to deal with the increased cost of developing for the PS3. Please, either formulate a better argument or read a book...
Toodles
|
Accually.
You know why they are lazy, because they are basically refusing to try something new because it's too hard for them. It is laziness, I doubt they have even TRIED to develop on it. Lazy developers in my opinion.
|
LOL Right, so you want them to TRY to develop a game for the PS3's architecture at an additional cost? Just to appease your agenda?
If resources were unlimited and money was not an issue, I am sure Valve could churn out a PS3 game just like any other developer, but it does not fit Valve's current business model apparently...It's not worthwhile financially for Valve to produce games for the PS3
Why release a game for a more complicated architecture that will ultimately cost more if you do not foresee a benefit?! What logical person or entity would do that?!
Business and money are real world concepts. It's a very serious thing. Serious companies are not going to go out on a limb and create something unless they expect a certain return on investment.
What Valve is communicating is that it does not want to risk the resources to produce a PS3 game, because it believes it will not be satisfied with the financial results.
I STRONGLY urge you to take a class on economics, finance and accounting. These concepts are really not hard to grasp.
Using your logic, I can state that you are lazy because you won't read a book or take a class on business
